Saturday, December 1, 2012

5 Résumé Details to Never Read Again

Any manager who works for a growing company, especially in the tech sphere, knows that hiring is an ongoing task. You have new needs to fill, people leave for greener pastures, or you just finally fired an incompetent employee. You sigh, imagining the stack of résumés looming in your near future.

You know that it’s illegal to discriminate when hiring—against women, people of a certain color or religion or age, and more. “I’d never do that,” you think. Alas, even the best of us have trouble keeping subtle discrimination at bay, putting any hiring manager at risk of a lawsuit or simply narrowing the talent pool unnecessarily. So here’s how to keep bias out of your hiring decision.

Studies show that nearly everyone has biases, and that we usually don’t know we have them. These biases harm our decisions and may be the root of subtle but real and even pervasive discrimination. They often operate below the surface of conscious thought, so you may not even be able to detect them as they happen.
Problematic biases start with the first things you learn about a candidate, usually in the résumé, and may stop you from going any farther. Without ever noticing it, you might reject one résumé and proceed to interviews, but accept another otherwise identical résumé—identical but for a few details that trigger associations and biases best kept away from your decision. You may lose out on great candidates before you even get started.

The best protection against accidentally discriminating, inappropriately or illegally, is never knowing the information in the first place. Sure, at some point you will inevitably know the race and probably the sex and approximate age of a candidate, but the longer you avoid knowing it the better and clearer your decisions will be. With a little preparation, you can avoid it from the point of first contact.

How? Take some information out of every résumé before you look at it. Of course you’ll have to draft someone else to do this, or ask your sources or candidates to do so. The benefit is that you won’t see bias-triggering information before you’ve made a decision on whether to proceed with a candidate, and what’s more, stripping out that irrelevant information will help the important things come into focus.

You or a third party can redact résumés in common electronic formats such as Word and PDF documents without much difficulty. Word documents can be directly edited and saved. For PDFs, in Adobe Reader you can highlight a section of text, right-click on the selection, choose properties, and change the highlight color to black. The data is still technically in the document, but all you need to do is hide it from sight. Place a comment next to the text with any substitution you want to make, as suggested below.

Here are five kinds of information that often appear on résumés that you can safely remove before seriously examining them.

Name

Names are packed with information about sex and ethnicity, social class, age, and more. Studies demonstrate that people form ideas about a person’s likeability and the tendency to hire based on just a name. You don’t need to know any of this to make sound decisions, so replace names with neutral random identifiers.

Citizenship

Unless you legitimately require particular citizenship, it’s illegal to discriminate based on nationality. More obviously problematic than names, the information is nonetheless often stated or easily inferred from many résumés. Remove it when you can.
Of course there’s no hiding the fact that IIT Madras is in India and Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne is in Switzerland. Attending school in a country doesn’t mean you’re a citizen, but it’s an easy assumption to make because it’s usually true. It’s valuable to know that a candidate attended a prestigious school, but you might substitute “top 50 school” or “top 500 school” to learn what you need to know to make a sound decision.

Year of graduation

Ageism is an insidious aspect of the workforce and manifests strongly in the recruiting process. While it’s common and usually appropriate for candidates to say how many years of experience they have with the techniques or technologies relevant to the job, it is never necessary to know, when looking at a résumé, exactly when a person graduated. It’s too easy to infer age. While an older candidate may have recently graduated with a germane degree, he or she is more likely to have obtained a degree long ago, and the graduation year is a dead giveaway. Ask for a year of graduation later, when you need to conduct a background check.

Specific dates of employment

Specific dates show gaps. Readers notice gaps in employment history automatically, and that leads to speculation. A year-long or multi-year gap could be a sign of time off to raise children, indicating the candidate’s familial circumstances. It might also indicate unemployment due to any number of other reasons, but how could you know which it is by looking at dates on a page? You’ll find out later if you need to; at the résumé-reading stage, you don’t need to know, and it could mislead you. List the length of time in each position instead.

Religious and political clubs and affiliations

Candidates frequently list outside or personal activities on their résumés, typically at the very end. They may be intended to show good citizenship, or even some relevant experience, such as leadership, by running a club or campaigning for a political party. While possibly interesting, these personal activities are too likely to trigger biases on religious, political, ethnic, or other grounds. Especially relevant experience should be in the main body of the résumé, so it’s probably best to remove this section entirely.

Wrap up: Promoting sound decisions

Removing extraneous information reduces the risk of discriminating against applicants. Without this data, subtle or invisible biases don’t have a chance to harm your decision making ability, and with less text to read and think about, the most salient elements stand out. A short checklist like this one makes the redaction process quick and easy, increasing the clarity of your résumé analysis at minimal cost. 

No comments: